Problems Permeate the National Park Service's Most Iconic Parks from Coast to Coast

Commercial Visitor Services - Doing Business in the National Parks is Problematic Due to the Systemic Random and Arbitrary Actions by Senior National Park Service Managers Acting in their Official Capacities

Overview
On December 17, 2008, The Washington Post reported that then President-elect Barrack Obama nominated Senator Ken Salazar as the new Secretary of the Interior,

"In response to questions, Obama said the Interior Department has been 'deeply troubled' under the Bush administration and 'too often has been seen as an appendage of commercial interests as opposed to a place where the values and interests of the American people are served.'... 'I also want an Interior Department that, very frankly, cleans up its act,' Obama said. 'There have been too many problems and too much emphasis on big-time lobbyists in Washington and not enough emphasis on what’s good for the American people, and that’s going to change under Ken Salazar.'" (emphasis added)

Unfortunately, more than three years later, the Interior Department is still "deeply troubled" under the Obama Administration and not focused on "what's good for the American people," and no where is this more prevalent than with the management of the Interior Department's National Park Service bureau, including for example, at these iconic parks: 

1. Independence National Historical Park in Pennsylvania involving the dispute between the NPS and the NPS's agent - the Independence Visitor Center Corporation with The Constitutional Walking Tour of Philadelphia
2. Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming and the Triangle X Ranch
3. National Mall and Memorial Parks in Washington, D.C. with the Tourmobile
4. Point Reyes National Seashore in California with the Drakes Bay Oyster Farm
5. Mount Rainier National Park in Washington with Rainier Mountaineering Inc.
6. Grand Canyon in Arizona with The Coca-Cola Company

While the issues vary somewhat from one unit of the National Park Service to another unit, the common denominator across all of these national parks is that the NPS's random and arbitrary actions in terms of Commercial Visitor Services have adversely impacted the economy, jobs, small businesses, visitor experience, the environment, etc. For example, in the case with The Constitutional Walking Tour, the National Park Service has successfully argued that the Gateway Visitor Center Authorization Act trumps the National Parks Omnibus Management Act of 1988 (or Concessions Act), but in in the Triangle X case, the National Park Service has argued that the Concessions Act trumps the Grand Teton National Park Act of 1950.  As detailed below, it seems that the NPS cannot have it both ways. To these ends, the NPS's actions have amplified the need for Congressional oversight to address the unfettered discretion that manifests itself in terms of vast inconsistencies in NPS's policies across the United States.

National Park Service - Noble Cause Corruption with "The Case of the Indian Trader"

"Americans have grown accustomed to hearing about scandal and corruption in government. But few people are aware that such problems exist within the National Park Service." -- Paul Berkowitz, Retired Criminal Investigator, National Park Service

Overview
In April 2011, the University of New Mexico Press published Paul D. Berkowitz's new book, "The Case of the Indian Trader: Billy Malone and the National Park Service Investigation at Hubbell Trading Post."

This is the story of Billy Malone and the end of an era. Mr. Malone lived almost his entire life on the Navajo Reservation working as an Indian trader in Arizona; the last real Indian trader to operate the historic Hubbell Trading Post. In 2004, the National Park Service (NPS) launched an investigation targeting Mr. Malone, alleging a long list of crimes that seemed similar to Al Capone's criminal capers. In 2005, Federal agent Paul Berkowitz was assigned to take over the year-and-a-half-old case. Mr. Berkowtiz's investigation uncovered serious problems with the original allegations made by the NPS, raising questions about the integrity of his NPS supervisors and colleagues as well as high-level NPS managers.  In an intriguing account of whistle-blowing, Mr. Berkowitz tells how he bypassed his chain-of-command and delivered his shocking findings directly to the Office of the Inspector General at the U.S. Department of the Interior.

National Park Service Erroneously Claimed in Federal Court Filings that National Park Service Officials Have Never Served on the Board of Directors of the Independence Visitor Center Corporation, a Private Corporation

The Paper Trail and Money Trail Show That Senior National Park Service Managers Have Served in Their Official Capacities on the Board of Directors of the Independence Visitor Center Corporation

On November 23, 2009, Michael Levy, Margaret Hutchinson, and Viveca Parker, the United States Attorneys representing the National Park Service ("NPS") defendants in the lawsuit brought by The Constitutional Walking Tour of Philadelphia ("The Constitutional"), erroneously argued in the NPS's Motion to Dismiss filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that NPS officials do not serve, and moreover have never served, on the Independence Visitor Center Corporation's ("IVCC") Board of Directors,

"Mr. [Dennis] Reidenbach and Ms. [Cynthia] MacLeod are not IVCC board members, and never have been, but they attend board meetings as representatives of the [Independence National Historical] Park and NPS. See current IVCC Board of Directors, and page 1 of June 18, 2009 minutes of Board meeting, attached hereto." (Defs. Reply, p. 9) (emphasis added)

Media Alert - Summary of the Matter Pending in Front of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit: Oral Argument Scheduled for December 6, 2011

Media Alert

Who
The Constitutional Guided Walking Tours, LLC, Jonathan Bari and Leslie Bari (Plaintiffs-Appellants) vs. Independence Visitor Center Corporation, William W. Moore, National Park Service, Dennis Reidenbach, Cynthia MacLeod and Darla Sidles (Defendants-Appellees)

What
Lawsuit pending with the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit (Case Documents can be found here)

When
December 6, 2011 - Oral Argument scheduled (time to be determined)

Where

Federal Court in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with the literal and figurative backdrop of Independence National Historical Park (a unit of the NPS) featuring Independence Hall and the Liberty Bell – America’s Birthplace 

Why
This is a David v. Goliath fight between a small business - The Constitutional Walking Tour vs. the National Park Service and its agent, the Independence Visitor Center Corp. This story focuses on backroom deals, pay to play politics, crony capitalism, heavy hand of government, random and arbitrary government regulations, etc. At the nearly 400 national parks across the country where commercial visitor services occur (i.e., Yellowstone, Yosemite), the concessions award process is followed - however, that is not the case in Philadelphia.

Case Documents - In the Matter of The Constitutional Guided Walking Tours, LLC, Jonathan Bari and Leslie Bari (Plaintiffs) vs. Independence Visitor Center Corporation, William W. Moore, National Park Service, Dennis Reidenbach, Cynthia MacLeod and Darla Sidles (Defendants)

Following are the Case Documents in the Matter of The Constitutional Guided Walking Tours, LLC, Jonathan Bari and Leslie Bari (Plaintiffs) vs. Independence Visitor Center Corporation, William W. Moore, National Park Service, Dennis Reidenbach, Cynthia MacLeod and Darla Sidles (Defendants).

The Case Documents include those filed in the following Federal Courts:

• United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania - Case Number: 2-09-cv-03083 Note: Oral Argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Court in Philadelphia is scheduled for December 6, 2011.
• United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit Court- Case Number: 11-2146

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
 
I. COMPLAINT
Original Complaint - The Constitutional Walking Tour
July 10, 2009
The Constitutional Guided Walking Tours, LLC, Jonathan Bari and Leslie Bari (Plaintiffs) vs. Independence Visitor Center Corporation, William W. Moore, National Park Service, Dennis Reidenbach, Cynthia MacLeod and Darla Sidles (Defendants); United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania at No. 09-cv-03083; July 10, 2009.

National Park Service Has Infringed on the Second Amendment in Philadelphia

The Secretary of the Interior and the National Park Service Have Abused Their Management Discretion at America’s Birthplace in Philadelphia – Home of Where the Second Amendment was Adopted in 1791

The Secretary of the Department of the Interior ("DOI"), acting through the National Park Service ("NPS"), has acted randomly and arbitrarily, and in turn has restricted various Constitutional rights, including those of the Second Amendment, at Independence National Historical Park ("INHP"), a unit of the NPS, in Philadelphia. Just two months after the Federal law governing possession of firearms inside a National Park changed on February 22, 2010, the Secretary of the Interior entered into a statutorily authorized, detailed and long-term Operating Agreement between the United States Department of the Interior - National Park Service and the Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("Operating Agreement") dated April 26, 2010.

This matter is a significant public policy issue for those concerned about Civil Rights, and as such various groups should take action including the National Rifle Association ("NRA") and the NRA's Institute for Legislative Action, especially since this is happening in the shadow of Independence Hall where the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791.

Overview
According to the Operating Agreement, the NPS has placed random and arbitrary limitations on the Second Amendment. Specifically, Section C.20 (page 16) of the Operating Agreement, "Marketing Partnerships and Commercial Activities Undertaken by Third-Parties," states,

"Further, the IVCC [Independence Visitor Center Corporation] agrees that it will not enter into a marketing partnership or agreement with any individual or entity who sells, distributes or trades in, or who is otherwise clearly associated with, alcohol, tobacco, firearms or pornographic material, nor will it enter into any marketing partnership or agreement requiring actions on federal property which may result in a violation of the Establishment Clause of the Constitution." (emphasis added)

It appears that the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the National Park Service's Northeast Regional Director Dennis Reidenbach, is now legislating through the NPS’s unfettered management discretion at INHP. To that end, it makes no sense that the NPS has placed these arbitrary restrictions on its "partner," the Independence Visitor Center Corporation. Instead of exercising the NPS's discretion to create new rules that violate clearly established Constitutional rights, the NPS should simply follow the laws already in place for the management and operation of National Parks, including those laws governing concessions and commercial operations at National Parks. For the record, the signatories on the Operating Agreement are Mr. Reidenbach acting on behalf of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and James J. Cuorato, President and CEO of the Independence Visitor Center Corporation.

Independence National Historical Park Background
Independence National Historical Park ("INHP") is America’s Birthplace. "The park represents the founding ideals of the nation and is a national and international symbol of democracy and liberty." The Bill of Rights was adopted in 1791 in INHP, and Independence Park has a distinct and singular association with the right of assembly, the right of free speech, the right to petition the government and the right to keep and bear arms.

The Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("IVCC") Appears to Peddle Influence by Offering to Sell a Seat on the IVCC’s Board of Directors to a For-Profit Company

For $125,000.00, “A Seat on the IVCC Board of Directors for a Commerce Bank Executive.”

From 2000 to the present, the Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("IVCC") has touted its Board of Directors, which has had an impressive array of powerful and connected individuals including the Director of the National Park Service ("NPS"), a Managing Director with the Pew Charitable Trusts, the President & CEO of the Center City District, a Deputy Vice Dean of The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, the Mayor of Philadelphia, a representative for the Governor of Pennsylvania and the Governor of Pennsylvania's former Chief of Staff.

The Federal and state funded Independence Visitor Center Corporation operates the Independence Visitor Center ("IVC") at Independence National Historical Park ("INHP"), a unit of the NPS, in Philadelphia.   The IVC is owned and operated by the United States of America - National Park Service, which then sub-contracts with the IVCC, a taxpayer supported public charity, to manage the IVC.

In a 2004-2007 sponsorship proposal that the IVCC developed entitled, “Commerce Bank’s Partnership with the Independence Visitor Center Corporation,” the IVCC appears to have proposed a $125,000.00 three-year promotional sponsorship agreement to Commerce Bank, a for-profit company.

Given the clandestine nature of the IVCC, we do not know what was agreed upon between the IVCC and Commerce Bank, but suffice it to say that Commerce Bank has been one of the long-term paid-for sponsors of the IVCC as evidenced by its Commerce Bank branded ATM in the main entrance (now a TD Bank ATM, since TD Bank acquired Commerce in March 2008), Commerce Bank signage at the IVC, Commerce Bank promotions at the IVC and INHP, Commerce Bank logo and ad on the backs of IVC sold tickets, Commerce Bank logo on the IVC Web site, Commerce Bank promotion on the IVCC's Facebook page, etc. (all similar to what was outlined in the proposal entitled "Commerce Bank’s Partnership with the Independence Visitor Center Corporation").

Lack of Diversity on the Taxpayer Funded Independence Visitor Center Corporation's Board of Directors

Of the 18 Members of the Independence Visitor Center Corporation's ("IVCC") Board of Directors, the IVCC Appears to Have 16 White Directors, 2 Black Directors, and Zero Directors of Either Hispanic or Asian Origin

The Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("IVCC") operates the Independence Visitor Center ("IVC") at Independence National Historical Park ("INHP"), a unit of the National Park Service ("NPS"), in Philadelphia. The IVC is owned and operated by the United States of America - National Park Service, which then has sub-contracted with the IVCC, a taxpayer supported 501(c)(3) public charity, to manage the IVC. Some of the most important moments in American history transpired at INHP: the drafting and signing of the Declaration of Independence and the drafting, debating and signing of the Constitution of the United States.

The Independence Visitor Center itself is situated just across the street from the Liberty Bell Center, which houses the iconic Liberty Bell that has come to symbolize America's freedom for many different groups: the early patriots, the abolitionists, those fighting for women's suffrage, and many seeking freedom throughout the world. As the gateway to INHP -- the place where America's freedom was established and where this great melting pot of diversity was born -- the IVCC should be quite cognizant of maintaining a governing Board of Directors that represents the great diversity of Philadelphia and America as a whole. Unfortunately, the IVCC has instead created an insular and homogeneous Board of Directors that does not reflect the diverse constituent base which funds the IVCC and which the IVCC serves.

Disparate Treatment by the Independence Visitor Center Corporation and National Park Service Has Unfairly Deprived The Constitutional Walking Tour of Economic Impact from Twenty Million Visitors

Overview
On May 26, 2011, the Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("IVCC") at Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia celebrated the twenty millionth visitor to the Independence Visitor Center ("IVC"). In its 2010 Annual Report, the IVCC touts its economic impact:

"In 2010, the IVCC influenced approximately $42 million in additional tourism spending--at attractions, restaurants, shops and more--and the positive impressions and memories generated have immeasurable benefits for years to come."

"22% of visitors report that they spend more in Philadelphia because of their visit to the Visitor Center. The average increase in expenditures was $155."

"As a result of their visit to the Independence Visitor Center, participants added an average of 2.3 attractions to their itinerary (average of 2008, 2009 and 2010)." (emphasis found in original quotation)

Unfortunately, The Constitutional Walking Tour ("The Constitutional") had no access to the vast majority of the twenty million visitors and resulting economic impact therefrom, because of the disparate treatment that The Constitutional had received at the hands of the IVCC and the National Park Service ("NPS").  In turn, these regulations which were applied randomly and arbitrarily had a pronounced detrimental effect on The Constitutional's business, ultimately driving The Constitutional from the Independence Visitor Center.

On February 20, 2008, Bill Moore, President and CEO of the IVCC, testified to Philadelphia City Council, "One of the hallmarks of a visit to any historic city is a great tour." The Constitutional Walking Tour agrees that a great tour can illuminate the incredible past of a historic city, especially Philadelphia which is America's Birthplace. Unfortunately, Mr. Moore, other IVCC officials, and the NPS have negotiated back-room deals and arbitrarily dictated which tours visitors should take, thereby suppressing consumer choice and the free market in the pursuit of random and unfair regulation.

National Park Service and Independence Visitor Center Corporation Obfuscated Issues and Misled Congress

Overview
In December 2006, Senator Arlen Specter reached out to Dennis Reidenbach, Superintendent, Independence National Historical Park ("INHP"), and suggested a proposal to have INHP offer walking tour companies comparable accessibility and visibility to riding tour companies for visitors at the taxpayer funded Independence Visitor Center ("IVC"). Just days after Mr. Reidenbach received Senator Specter's proposal, Mr. Reidenbach appears to have summarily dismissed the proposal, even though he represented to Senator Specter that he "carefully reviewed" his proposal. Further, the Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("IVCC") adamantly lobbied the NPS in support of Mr. Reidenbach's rejection: "If we move an inch on this issue chaos will be the result" and we must "not offer or open the door an inch." In his rejection of Senator Specter's proposal which obfuscated the issues, Mr. Reidenbach said that he was "committed to working equally with all commercial tour operators", but that he was "not willing to open more space in the IVC to solicitation and ticket sales." That statement was untrue.  Just six months after Mr. Reidenbach outrightly rejected Senator Specter's proposal to not open up any more space for ticket sales inside of the Independence Visitor Center, Philadelphia Trolley Works and Big Bus Company debuted a brand new ticket sales concessions booth inside the Independence Visitor Center. However, The Constitutional Walking Tour was not offered the same commercial opportunities and concessions contracts made available by the NPS and IVCC to The Constitutional's competitors.

The Independence Visitor Center Corporation and National Park Service Sought to Suppress Constitutional Rights with Confidentiality Agreement

Overview
At Independence National Historical Park ("INHP"), the First Continental Congress, "justly alarmed at [the] arbitrary proceeding of parliament and administration," began their formal protests against King George III with a Declaration of Rights & Grievances, leading to The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States. Independence National Historical Park is America’s Birthplace. The Bill of Rights was adopted in 1791 at what is now INHP, giving INHP a particularly strong association with the right of freedom of speech and the right to petition the government. It is ironic that the National Park Service and the Federally-funded Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("IVCC") have worked in concert with one another to silence their critics through pretextual confidentiality agreements. Moreover, trying to silence The Constitutional shocked the conscience since the NPS's and IVCC's actions represented a very high level of abuse of power in which the NPS and its agent, the IVCC, acted randomly and arbitrarily, against The Constitutional.

The Constitutional Walking Tour's recent termination of its business operations at the Independence Visitor Center ("IVC") was the unfortunate consequence of years of failed good faith efforts by The Constitutional to have equitable visibility and accessibility both inside and outside the Independence Visitor Center ("IVC") due to the mismanagement and egregious behavior of the Independence Visitor Center Corporation and the National Park Service.

Background
Since 2005, The Constitutional has requested to license for a fee a dedicated ticket sales concession booth from the National Park Service and the IVCC on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms commensurate with Ride the Ducks and Philadelphia Trolley Works, for example. Additionally, since 2005, The Constitutional has requested to also license/secure written permissions (i.e. commercial use authorizations, special use permit, memorandum of understanding, etc.) from the National Park Service and the IVCC on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms commensurate with other third parties including Ride the Ducks, Philadelphia Trolley Works and Lights of Liberty, for example. However, each request by The Constitutional was either ignored or rebuffed by the NPS and the IVCC.

On May 31, 2008, The Constitutional again approached the Independence Visitor Center Corporation and the National Park Service to license a dedicated ticket sales booth inside the IVC, along the lines of the ticket sales booths operated by Ride the Ducks and Philadelphia Trolley Works. For the first time in approximately fifteen separate requests, the IVCC responded affirmatively and indicated that a ticket concession booth license agreement ("License Agreement") would be sent to The Constitutional.

On or about June 10, 2008, substantive discussions and negotiations commenced between The Constitutional (through Jonathan and Leslie Bari) and IVCC (through Christine Keates, IVCC's General Manager, at the request of William Moore, IVCC's former President and CEO) over licensing a ticket sales concession booth inside of the Independence Visitor Center, with the IVCC and its agents representing their desire to reach such a concession agreement. On June 14, 2008, Mr. Moore approved the location of said ticket sales booth for The Constitutional that was agreed upon in meetings and discussions between the Baris and the Ms. Keates.

On June 27, 2008, the IVCC’s legal counsel at Ballard Spahr sent a 26-page draft short-term License Agreement to The Constitutional for a dedicated ticket sales booth that would run from July 1, 2008 to February 29, 2009. IVCC’s counsel curiously asked that The Constitutional propose what it would like to pay for the "License Fee, the Percentage Payment and the Percentage Payment Trigger Amount." This request for The Constitutional to name its own price demonstrated that no standard policy existed at the IVCC and NPS regarding License Agreements for concessions, since if any standards existed, the IVCC and NPS would have simply stated the price (franchise fee) required to lease a kiosk, like any reasonable landlord would do when leasing commercial space.

Curiously though, the IVCC at one point seemed to consider establishing a system that would have been standardized and equitable. On April 19, 2005, Mr. Moore wrote to Scott Lewis, General Manager of Ride the Ducks Philadelphia,

"There is the high likelihood that each of the tour operators are going to want the same type space [ticket sales booth] in the [Independence] Visitor Center when your group moves in the building . We are planning on a large area with equal spaces so we don’t have to deal with the equality issues between operators."

However, as the so-called "standard policy" evolved by the NPS and IVCC, Mr. Moore wrote to the NPS’s Dennis Reidenbach and Steve Sitarski on July 5, 2007: "The installation of booths is not a one size fits all plan." (emphasis added)

Despite the lack of equitable and standardized processes, The Constitutional continued to attempt to work with the IVCC and NPS. On July 11, 2008, The Constitutional emailed its detailed comments, questions and proposals on the draft License Agreement to the IVCC’s counsel and to the IVCC's senior management; The Constitutional requested a conference call or meeting the following week so that the parties could work quickly to finalize the License Agreement for the remaining portion of the Summer 2008 tourist season. To this day, no response has been received from the IVCC and/or the NPS to The Constitutional's written comments, questions and proposals sent back on July 11, 2008.

Instead, on July 25, 2008, IVCC’s counsel sent The Constitutional an overly broad and onerous draft Confidentiality Agreement that would bind The Constitutional to not disclose an almost unbounded range of information in perpetuity even if no License Agreement was ever executed.

The Constitutional Walking Tour Terminated at the Independence Visitor Center ("IVC"); IVC CEO Refused to "Diginfy" The Constitutional's Operational Concerns and Deemed Such Concerns "Nonsense"

April is the official start of The Constitutional Walking Tour's public tour operations for 2011, and The Constitutional Walking Tour will not be operating from the Independence Visitor Center. In fact, due to threatening comments posed by the Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("IVCC") and a prolonged and inflexible refusal by the Independence Visitor Center Corporation and National Park Service ("NPS") to compromise, to act in good faith and to not act in a random and arbitrary manner, The Constitutional Walking Tour no longer has any business relations with the Independence Visitor Center Corporation.

Issues negatively affecting the working relationship between The Constitutional, the IVCC and the National Park Service arose more than five years ago. Since the Spring of 2006, The Constitutional has made repeated efforts to facilitate an agreement and resolution amenable to all parties. The IVCC and NPS have repeatedly rebuffed The Constitutional's attempts. In July 2009, following an established pattern of improper treatment by NPS and the IVCC, The Constitutional filed litigation as a last resort. Even after the litigation was filed, The Constitutional used good faith efforts to negotiate a settlement for past damages and for a means of operating at the Independence Visitor Center ("IVC") in a fair and equal way going forward.

One such effort by The Constitutional to amicably resolve operational issues at the IVC occurred on July 8, 2010, when The Constitutional reached out via email to Jim Cuorato, President and CEO of the IVCC. Due to the lack of visibility and accessibility imposed by random and arbitrary treatment by the IVCC and NPS, The Constitutional had experienced poor sales over the July 4th holiday weekend, and these disappointing figures were caused by the actions of the IVCC and NPS. In light of these operational challenges, The Constitutional contacted Mr. Cuorato seeking a way to avoid such issues in the future.

Instead of seriously regarding The Constitutional's concerns and engaging in a dialogue that would lead to better results for all involved parties, Mr. Cuorato tersely and dismissively replied to The Constitutional on July 9, 2010.   Mr. Cuorato dismissively refused to "dignify" The Constitutional's feedback with a "specific response" since Mr. Cuorato deemed it "un-partner-like behavior" and "nonsense."  Mr. Cuorato wrote, "I find it interesting, but not surprising, that you chose to write this nonsense. I will not dignify your letter below with a specific response." Mr. Cuorato concluded with a thinly veiled threat:

"Your antics have stretched my patience. So if you are not happy with either ticket sales or promotional events that we undertake in our building, I would be happy to stop selling your tickets and end our relationship (and am seriously considering doing so in any event)."

The prolonged and unchecked actions of the IVCC and the NPS have now caused The Constitutional Walking Tour to stop doing business once and for all at the IVC as of November 30, 2010.  With The Constitutional no longer operating at the IVC, it appears that Mr. Cuorato's plan has reached fruition. In light of the continued refusal of the IVCC and NPS to seriously and meaningfully discuss ways in which to address The Constitutional's concerns, The Constitutional is pressing forward with the lawsuit against the Independence Visitor Center Corporation and National Park Service. The Constitutional Walking Tour is seeking compensatory and punitive damages, including for lost profits, damaged reputation, loss of goodwill, legal fees and costs, whereby The Constitutional may realize some of the value that it could have realized in the creation, operation and potential sale of its business, but for the egregious actions of the IVCC and NPS.

National Park Service Concessions - Independence National Historical Park

The above video outlines the main challenges The Constitutional encounters at Independence National Historical Park due to the unfair regulatory practices in place there. The Constitutional is seeking equitable treatment from the National Park Service and Independence Visitor Center in Philadelphia, in terms of visibility and accessibility for the operations of its guided historical tour business, as compared with other tour operators.

---------------

The exhibits below illustrate the landscape and floor plan of the Independence Visitor Center in Philadelphia, both inside and outside, and how the Independence Visitor Center Corporation and National Park Service have forced The Constitutional Walking Tour to be completely marginalized both and inside and outside of this 50,000+ square foot complex.

EXTERIOR:

• Exterior 1-Overview of the IVC exterior and surrounding area
• Exterior 2-Detailed look at the IVC exterior and the prominence competitors have over The Constitutional

INTERIOR:

• Interior 1-Overview of IVC interior with emphasis on north end, where tour operators are located
• Interior 2-Detailed look at the IVC interior and the limited space allotted to walking tours (Note: walking tours have since moved to the far north wall and have therefore been further marginalized)
• Interior 3-Detailed look at the IVC interior and the prominence competitors have over The Constitutional

Ride the Ducks Photo Concessions on National Park Service Property

The above video clearly shows concession sales occurring on sidewalks around the Independence Visitor Center, on National Park Service property. Despite awareness by involved parties, despite the fact that the opportunity to sell concessions has been denied to The Constitutional, Ride the Ducks regularly violates their Commercial Use Authorizations and engages in these prohibited activities with no consequences. This demonstrates the inconsistent, random and arbitrary standards in place at Independence National Historical Park.

Seeking Congressional Oversight on The National Park Service

It should not take four years and a team of lawyers for a small business to be able to compete on a level playing field in dealings with the National Park Service (NPS) at Independence National Historical Park and the Independence Visitor Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. However, that is exactly the case for The Constitutional Walking Tour of Philadelphia. To that end, in this economic crisis when many companies in diverse industries are seeking a federal bailout, The Constitutional is simply seeking a federal breakthrough to ensure that it receives equitable treatment from the National Park Service and Independence Visitor Center in terms of visibility and accessibility for the operations of its guided historical tour business, as compared with other tour operators.

The Declaration of Tourism Independence

Overview
President-elect Obama called for a “new Declaration of Independence” when he was in Philadelphia on January 17, 2009 during his Whistle Stop Tour to Washington, D.C.,

“And yet while our problems may be new, what is required to overcome them is not. What is required is the same perseverance and idealism that our founders displayed. What is required is a new declaration of independence, not just in our nation, but in our own lives - from ideology and small thinking, prejudice and bigotry - an appeal not to our easy instincts but to our better angels.”[i]

THE DECLARATION OF TOURISM INDEPENDENCE
IN CONGRESS, March 12, 2009.

The Unanimous Declaration of THE CONSTITUTIONAL WALKING TOUR OF PHILADELPHIA,

When, in the course of an unprecedented economic crisis coupled with unfair, random, arbitrary and capricious actions by the National Park Service, it becomes necessary for one small business to dissolve the bonds which have had a material adverse effect on the overall visitor experience to America’s Birthplace at Independence National Historical Park (Independence Park) in Philadelphia for numerous reasons, including the National Park Service’s violations of the spirit of Independence Park’s enabling legislation[ii] and willful non-compliance with the Gateway [Independence] Visitor Center Authorization Act.[iii]

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all tour operators are created equal, that these qualified tour operators should be endowed with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of operating a tour business on a level playing field free from the National Park Service’s random, arbitrary and capricious actions imposed under its wide and unchecked discretionary authority. It is the right of a tour operator which complements park relevance and enhances visitor experience to demand an immediate cessation of the intolerable acts of the National Park Service and the Independence Visitor Center.[iv] It is the vendor’s right, it is the entrepreneurs’ duty, to demand fair treatment including having the National Park Service authorize The Constitutional’s environmentally friendly walking tour to have accessibility and visibility to visitors, comparable to more favored vendors which receive such authorizations from the National Park Service. Such has been the patient sufferance of visitors; and such is now the necessity which constrains the vendors to alter their former systems – say goodbye to business as usual at Independence Park and the Independence Visitor Center, which has devolved into a Federally subsidized bus depot at the Visitor Center that preferences carbon emitting, for-profit motorized tours over The Constitutional’s green tours. The history of Independence Park is a history of the people protesting with a Declaration of Rights & Grievances against King George III over unfair taxation and unjust trade practices, leading to The Declaration of Independence, and the birth of the United States of America. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.

The evolution of Independence Park and the increase in popularity of heritage tourism at America’s Birthplace have combined to subject the discriminated vendors - Tour Operators like The Constitutional Walking Tour of Philadelphia - to the brink of shutting down, the evidence of which is stated below:

• For the National Park Service being willfully non-compliant with the 1999 Gateway Visitor Center Authorization, Public Law 106-131, for over nine years, by failing to execute a long-term detailed operating agreement with the Independence Visitor Center Corporation that would presumably set some formal ground rules for the equitable treatment and rights of vendors, including non-profit and for-profit entities that operate visitor and tour related services, at the Visitor Center.[v]
• For the National Park Service unfairly, arbitrarily and capriciously issuing written authorizations in the form of Commercial Use Authorizations (CUAs) and Special Use Permits to some “favored” third parties[vi] and not to other interested and qualified third parties such as The Constitutional Walking Tour which is complementary to the Park’s mission and visitor experience objectives, is appropriate for public use and enjoyment of the Park, is an environmentally friendly “green” tour, does not cause unacceptable impacts on the Park,[vii] and benefits the Independence Visitor Center (Visitor Center) and in turn the NPS financially from ticket sales for The Constitutional.
• For the National Park Service selectively enforcing rules and regulations including with existing Commercial Use Authorizations to preferred vendors who are given the CUAs.[viii]
• For the National Park Service issuing Commercial Use Authorizations to Ride the Ducks’ fictitious business entities such Philly Ducks, Penn Ducks and River Ducks to help Ride the Ducks circumvent the evident intent of City of Philadelphia’s laws.[ix]
• For the National Park Service and the Independence Visitor Center management randomly, arbitrarily and capriciously evicting The Constitutional from the Visitor Center in 2006 and 2007 with neither any notice nor cause following the Summer 2005 season when The Constitutional was the top selling tour at the Visitor Center sales desk.
• For the National Park Service enabling the Independence Visitor Center to require that The Constitutional sign a broad sweeping “gag order” masked as a confidentiality agreement as a required condition to negotiating a license agreement for a ticket booth comparable to what other motorized tour operators have licensed (the confidentiality terms were not a requirement of the other ticket booth licensees, and the non-disclosure terms would survive even if no license agreement was ever executed).
• For the National Park Service censoring The Constitutional’s popular marketing brochure called The Independent from being distributed on INHP grounds including at the Independence Visitor Center.
• For the National Park Service and the Visitor Center retaliating against The Constitutional in attempts to greater marginalize The Constitutional (The Constitutional’s historical sales from the Visitor Center declined approximately 77.0% from the 2005 summer tourist season to the 2008 summer tourist season, despite an overall growth in visitor traffic experienced in the Visitor Center, as reported by the NPS, and growth in The Constitutional’s other sales channels for its tour business).

The evolution of Independence Park and the increase in popularity of heritage tourism at America’s Birthplace have combined to subject the people - Visitors - to a lack of real consumer choice and artificially inflated prices, the evidence of which is stated below:

• For the National Park Service randomly, arbitrarily and capriciously giving preferential advantage to other non-motorized and motorized tours which have been granted special written authorizations and informal authorizations to conduct business practices that offer key competitive operational advantages.[x]
• For the National Park Service randomly, arbitrarily and capriciously preferencing tours which are not historically and/or contextually relevant to INHP, in addition to being detrimental to the visitor experience at Independence Park.
• For the National Park Service fostering a “polluted” environment that stifles innovation, limits consumer choice, and drives up tour prices – all adversely affecting the visitor experience.
• For the National Park Service fostering a polluted environment (air and noise) with motorized tour operators using various vehicles for their tours including World War II era DUKW (duck boat) amphibious vehicles, authentic London double decker buses and Victorian trolleys - These motorized vehicles provide tours on thematic vehicles having no contextual relevance to the historical interpretation of Independence National Historical Park (in the 1700s-1800s).

We, THE CONSTITUTIONAL WALKING TOUR, therefore do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people who visit America’s Birthplace and who attempt to operate a small business showcasing America’s Birthplace, solemnly publish and declare, that THE CONSTITUTIONAL will work to absolve the public from these problems by appealing to Congress and other government officials for long overdue oversight on the National Park Service. THE CONSTITUTIONAL pledges to act as the people’s most eco-friendly tour in Philadelphia from this day forward – Where Every Day is Independence Day!™

----------------

Exhibits: 





[i] http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/17/us/politics/17text-obama.html?ref=politics

[ii] “Independence National Historical Park Act of 1948” - U.S. Code, Title 16, Chapter 1, Subchapter LI. http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/16/ch1schLI.html

[iii] Public Law 106-131, December 1999, http://www.theconstitutional.com/news/inhp/Gateway%20Visitor%20Center%20Authorization%20Act%2012-7-99.pdf

[iv] The Independence Visitor Center was built on land owned by the Federal government and administered by the National Park Service. The NPS has contracted with a private entity, Independence Visitor Center Corporation, to operate the facility, and the NPS has supported the Visitor Center with Federal appropriations of $6.4 million since 2001 that has primarily been disbursed with annual appropriations of $850,000.00. The Visitor Center is approximately 50,000 square feet in size, and is marketed as the “largest facility of its kind in the world.” The Visitor Center was designed and intended to serve as a tourism hub and the primary point of orientation and visitor services for the Park and surrounding environs. The Visitor Center is the only official on-site ticketing location for visitors to pick up tickets to Independence Hall. The Visitor Center promotes the notion that that visitors need to “Start at the Center” in order to experience the “best way to see Philly.” For details, see http://www.theconstitutional.com/news/inhp/INHP-Payments-to-IVCC.pdf

[v] In lieu of a long term detailed operating agreement, the NPS issued a bare-bones temporary Special Use Permit to the IVCC in November 2001 and then has extended it 20 separate times “to allow additional time to finalize a formal [management] Agreement.” What is also even more curious about the repeated renewals of the Special Use Permit is that according to all of the audited financial statements of the IVCC since at least 2003, the NPS and IVCC have “substantially established a management agreement” that “calls for the NPS to make an annual payment of $850,000.00 to IVCC in exchange for the services provided by the IVCC more fully described in the agreement.” While more than $6.4 million has been spent by the Federal government to fund the IVCC’s operations since 2001, the NPS and IVCC have not executed a management agreement, and the operating agreement, which is supposedly done, is confidential and not available for public inspection.

[vi] Ride the Ducks, Philly Ducks (Ride the Ducks doing business as), River Ducks (Ride the Ducks doing business as), Penn Ducks (Ride the Ducks doing business as), 76 Carriage Company, Inc. (doing business as Philadelphia Trolley Works), Philadelphia Trolley Works (including its Franklin Footsteps walking tour), Big Bus Tours (Philadelphia Trolley Works doing business as), Lights of Liberty Inc. (walking tour), Historic Philadelphia, Inc. (including its walking tours), etc.

[vii] Management Policies 2006, National Park Service, Section 10, page 144 - Commercial Visitor Services, ISBN 0-16-076874-8, http://www.nps.gov/policy/MP2006.pdf

[viii] Ride the Ducks, Philly Ducks (Ride the Ducks doing business as), River Ducks (Ride the Ducks doing business as), Penn Ducks (Ride the Ducks doing business as), 76 Carriage Company, Inc. (doing business as Philadelphia Trolley Works), Philadelphia Trolley Works (including its Franklin Footsteps walking tour), Big Bus Tours (Philadelphia Trolley Works doing business as), Lights of Liberty Inc. (walking tour), Historic Philadelphia, Inc. (including its walking tours), etc.

[ix] Section 1, Title 9, Chapter 9-400 Carriers, of The Philadelphia Code, Regulation of Businesses, Trades and Professions, as amended on January 24, 2006. and “When Ducks Act Like Hogs: Tour-Bus Quackery,” Ronnie Polaneczky, Philadelphia Daily News, March 25, 2009, http://www.theconstitutional.com/news/inhp/Daily%20News%20Article%20Ride%20the%20Ducks%203-25-08.pdf

[x] Ride the Ducks, Philly Ducks (Ride the Ducks doing business as), River Ducks (Ride the Ducks doing business as), Penn Ducks (Ride the Ducks doing business as), 76 Carriage Company, Inc. (doing business as Philadelphia Trolley Works), Philadelphia Trolley Works (including its Franklin Footsteps walking tour), Big Bus Tours (Philadelphia Trolley Works doing business as), Lights of Liberty Inc. (walking tour), Historic Philadelphia, Inc. (including its walking tours), etc.

A Constitutional Crisis within Our National Park Service (NPS) System

Independence National Historical Park (INHP or the Park)

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [1]


With these words our nation launched a great experiment in freedom and democracy within a representative form of government where the rule of law and not the proclivities of individuals would govern civil society. These principles enshrined in one of our nation’s founding documents have endured for over 200 years and serve as a beacon to the world. However, in the City where these principles were forged, a gross violation of their spirit is occurring by the NPS.

OverviewIn an April 3, 2008 editorial entitled “Mall Madness,” The Philadelphia Daily News said that,

“For nine years, the [Independence] visitor center and [National] Park Service have failed to come up with an agreement to run the center that might make the rules governing tour companies more consistent and less arbitrary... This is a shameful state of affairs."[2]

Issue – Requesting a Breakthrough (Not a Bailout) for a Small Business
It should not take four years and a team of lawyers for a small business to try to compete on a level playing field free from unconstitutional, unfair, random and arbitrary practices by the National Park Service. However, that is exactly the case for Jonathan and Leslie Bari, husband and wife entrepreneurs, who invested in and developed their own American dream with The Constitutional Walking Tour of Philadelphia (The Constitutional). The Constitutional annually employs 30 people in providing guided walking tours of America’s Birthplace at INHP which features many historic sites including the Liberty Bell, Independence Hall and the National Constitution Center.

Even though The Constitutional is consistent with INHP’s enabling legislation,[3] is complementary to the Park’s mission and visitor experience objectives, is appropriate for public use and enjoyment of the Park, is an environmentally friendly “green” tour, does not cause unacceptable impacts on the Park,[4] and benefits the Independence Visitor Center (Visitor Center) and in turn the NPS financially from ticket sales for The Constitutional, NPS has exhibited an ongoing pattern and practice of malfeasance and discrimination against The Constitutional and violations of its owners’ various Constitutional rights.

In this unprecedented economic crisis, the bottom line is that The Constitutional is being regulated and taxed out of business by the National Park Service. While many companies in diverse industries are seeking a Federal bailout, The Constitutional is simply seeking a Federal breakthrough to overcome NPS’s non-compliance with Federal laws and NPS’s intransigence that have been enabled to date without any meaningful oversight.

Independence National Historical Park & Independence Visitor Center Corporation - Congressional Oversight Needed

Overview
In an April 3, 2008 editorial entitled "Mall Madness", The Philadelphia Daily News said that, "For nine years, the [Independence] visitor center and [National] Park Service have failed to come up with an agreement to run the center that might make the rules governing tour companies more consistent and less arbitrary... This is a shameful state of affairs." http://www.theconstitutional.com/news/inhp/mall.madness.pdf

Commentary (written by The Constitutional Walking Tour of Philadelphia)
Why is it that it took less time for America to land a man on the moon than it has for the National Park Service and the Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("IVCC") in Philadelphia to enter into an Operating Agreement? President Kennedy announced in May 1961 that he wanted to land a man on the moon and achieved that goal in July 1969. In contrast, on December 7, 1999, President Clinton signed the Gateway [Independence] Visitor Center Authorization Act (Public Law 106-131) which required that the IVCC enter into an Operating Agreement with Independence National Historical Park ("INHP"), a unit of the National Park Service. As we mark the law's ninth anniversary, no Operating Agreement has been signed, in spite of being statutorily-mandated.

The lack of an Operating Agreement is counter-productive and detrimental to the mission and effective transparent implementation thereof for both the IVCC and INHP. Without any written, detailed and publicly available Operating Agreement, then specific management activities and services are impossible to objectively track. Additionally, the flagrant non-compliance of the INHP and IVCC to execute this Operating Agreement has been detrimental to The Constitutional Walking Tour and other vendors since that Operating Agreement would presumably set some formal ground rules for the equitable treatment and rights of vendors at the Independence Visitor Center. In the absence of any Operating Agreement, The Constitutional has been unfairly treated and has been beholden to the wide discretionary powers of the INHP and IVCC that are used randomly, arbitrarily and capriciously.

Our Founding Fathers taught us that checks and balances are required for our system of government to work. However, a closer look at the IVCC reveals that there are few, if any, checks and balances with the IVCC and the National Park Service to ensure that the taxpayers' investment in these public trusts is effective, efficient and fair such that the Independence Visitor Center works as the United States Congress intended it to work.