National Park Service: A Growing Chorus for Transparency at the Independence Visitor Center Corporation

Monday, November 29, 2010

A Growing Chorus for Transparency at the Independence Visitor Center Corporation

Calls for openness at the publicly funded Independence Visitor Center Corporation ("IVCC") are increasing. In recent months, several elected members of the Pennsylvania Legislature have requested that IVCC adopt and abide by both the Pennsylvania Right to Know Law and Sunshine Act. Pennsylvania State Representative Michael O'Brien, Pennsylvania State Senator Anthony Williams, and Pennsylvania State Senator Lawrence Farnese have all written to Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter and Pennsylvania Governor Rendell, asking them to make the Independence Visitor Center transparent and to heed the Final Determinations of the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records by releasing documents related to the IVCC.

On September 21, 2010, Representative O'Brien wrote to both Mayor Nutter and Governor Rendell:

"As you know this entity [IVC] is located in my district and I feel it is important that such an entity located in the heart of the historic area should be beholden to the values [...] our country was founded on [...]"

On November 22, 2010, Senator Williams wrote to both Mayor Nutter and Governor Rendell, saying:

"I would request your leadership in abiding by the Sunshine Act and the Pennsylvania Right to Know law [...] It is my understanding, the requests under the Right to Know law are being denied. Since the IVC receives funds provided by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, it would be appropriate to have this request fulfilled."

On November 23, 2010, Senator Farnese wrote to both Mayor Nutter and Governor Rendell, also issuing a call for open operations:

"Compliance with the Right to Know Law and the Sunshine Act would provide openness and accountability to this publicly-funded entity and its operations [...] I ask for your leadership in following both the letter and spirit of open records laws in dealing both with Mr. Bari and any other citizen requesting information in the future."

Elected public officials are attempting to make the IVCC transparent. These elected officials have acknowledged the need of the IVCC to become accountable to the public which funds it.

It is time for Mayor Nutter and Governor Rendell to relent in their protection of the secretive business practices at the IVCC. It is time for Mayor Nutter and Governor Rendell to release the requested records as ordered by the Pennsylvania Office of Open Records and to demand transparency and accountability at the Independence Visitor Center Corporation.

---------------------------

Exhibits:
Letter from Representative Michael H. O'Brien to Governor Rendell, 9-21-2010

Letter from Representative Michael H. O'Brien to Mayor Nutter, 9-21-2010

Letter from Senator Anthony Williams to Governor Rendell, 11-22-2010

Letter from Senator Anthony Williams to Mayor Nutter, 11-22-2010

Letter from Senator Lawrence Farnese to Governor Rendell, 11-23-2010

Letter from Senator Lawrence Farnese to Mayor Nutter, 11-23-2010

Background on The Constitutional’s disputes with the NPS and Independence Visitor Center

The Constitutional Walking Tour of Philadelphia (“The Constitutional”) offers guided walking tours of the Independence National Historical Park area by providing a primary overview of Independence Park and visiting more than 20 of Independence Park’s most historic sites including the Liberty Bell, Independence Hall, Carpenters’ Hall, Declaration House, etc.

From 2005 to 2010, the Independence Visitor Center Corporation sold tickets for The Constitutional’s various tours only at the IVC’s main information and sales desk. The IVCC has received a 20.0% (twenty percent) sales commission on each ticket that it has sold for The Constitutional (ranging on average in gross price from $12.50 to $17.50). Since 2005, The Constitutional has requested to also license a dedicated ticket sales booth from the National Park Service and IVCC on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms commensurate with Ride the Ducks and Philadelphia Trolley Works, for example. Additionally, since 2005, The Constitutional has requested to also license marketing opportunities and commercial use authorizations from the National Park Service and IVCC on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms.

The Independence Visitor Center (“IVC”) is owned and operated by the United States of America - National Park Service (“NPS”), which then sub-contracts with the Independence Visitor Center Corporation (“IVCC”), a taxpayer supported public charity, to manage the IVC.

The IVCC and NPS have preferenced third parties including Ride the Ducks and Philadelphia Trolley Works, and the IVCC and NPS have discriminated against The Constitutional Walking Tour. The National Park Service has enabled the creation of this unfair business environment. The National Park Service and the IVCC have ignored and circumvented Federal management and concessions laws for the sale of goods and services at Independence National Historical Park that require open, transparent, competitive and appealable processes awarding concessions contracts for the sale of goods and services including tours.

To facilitate the administration of the National Park Service System, the Secretary of the Department of the Interior, acting through the NPS, is authorized under the National Park Service Organic Act (“Organic Act”) to carry out twelve categories of activities, none of which include transferring administrative responsibility to a private party [i.e., IVCC] or engaging in cooperative administration with a private party [i.e., IVCC]. 16 U.S.C. § 1a-2(a)–(l). Rather than grant the NPS discretion in its dealings with park concessioners, Congress established “carefully controlled safeguards against unregulated and indiscriminate use” of the parks in the National Parks Omnibus Management Act of 1998 (“Management Act”), which governs all national park public accommodations, facilities, and services. 16 U.S.C. § 5951 et seq.; see also 36 C.F.R. Part 51.2 (“policy underlying concessions contracts”). The safeguards are not limited to nationwide policy: Congress also manages the parks with significant visitor traffic on a park-by-park basis. See, e.g., 16 U.S.C. §§ 21–40c (Yellowstone), §§ 91–110d (Mount Rainier), §§ 212–218a (Abraham Lincoln’s Birthplace), and §§ 410z–410z-5 (Boston National). One of the dozens of national parks managed by specific statutes is Independence National Historical Park (“INHP”). 16 U.S.C. §407m–407s. As such, compliance here going forward would require the NPS, first, to reassume from the private IVCC the NPS’s duties “to administer, operate, manage, lease, and maintain” properties at INHP pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 407s; second, to award “all proposed concessions contracts … through a competitive selection process” pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 5952; and, third, to issue commercial use authorizations in a rational manner pursuant to a reasonable interpretation of 16 U.S.C. § 5966(c).

The IVCC and NPS have arbitrarily and randomly selected business partners in a non-competitive and clandestine manner; as such, the actions of the NPS and IVCC have from an economics perspective stifled competition, innovation and consumer choice. Ultimately the IVCC’s actions have enabled prices to increase for its preferred vendors to strengthen the for-profits’ financial performance. Visitors to Philadelphia will be better served when the IVCC’s management, manners and methods are fundamentally changed. This would include having the National Park Service abide by Federal concessions management laws. Specifically, this will entail only having the NPS award concessions sales contracts and not having the IVCC involved in any of the selecting, awarding, contracting and managing of Independence Park’s third party concessions, including inside the Independence Visitor Center. This is the model that is practiced in virtually every other of the 390 (three hundred ninety) National Park Service units across the United States (in 49 states) including at Yosemite, Yellowstone, Statue of Liberty, etc. Additionally, visitors and all stakeholders will be better served once the operation of the taxpayer funded IVCC is totally transparent and accountable. While part of the issue centers on a publicly funded charity competing against the private sector (i.e., by offering guided tours and services), it more so has to do with the manner in which the IVCC and NPS operate and discriminate against third party concessionaires, tour operators and vendors in a random and arbitrary fashion (i.e., with the licensing and leasing ticket sales kiosks by the IVCC to third party companies, for example).